Jump to content

User talk:Allforrous

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository


Prototyperspective (talk) 10:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Yogis by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 11:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

History of the World has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Adamant1 (talk) 02:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 21:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 11:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blank pages to be removed

[edit]

The empty pages (Category:2020 in Gościno, Category:2020 in Sierpc and other) that you have reported for deletion are needed so that when you click "→" or "←" in the template, the link does not lead anywhere. Please withdraw your deletion request. Grzexs (talk) 06:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disabilities

[edit]

Category:Accessibility is already a subcategory of disabilities Rathfelder (talk) 08:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

High courts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 06:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 20:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 21:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prototyperspective (talk) 14:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Sea and river deities has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 14:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Men of has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 08:14, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Water_ice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 08:41, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening dear Allforrous, I've just seen your revision of my edit on above mentioned category. Could you please explain the purpose of this to me? I actually don't understand it, because it is much easier to edit the template instead of all its categories. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is the way to modify main category and secondary categories, if there are any or any. Allforrous (talk) 00:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am referring to the categories cataloged with "| " and "|*". Allforrous (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This would also be possible by editing the template. Or am I missing something here? Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 19:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. But I'm not a template editor. Allforrous (talk) 23:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but could you then please stop editing categories with templates, because it's way easier to edit one template instead of countless categories? This is also the reason, why we are using templates. Many thanks. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please have a look at my edit on Template:Transportyear-Netherlands: link. I've already fixed the problem for you. Best regards, Fantaglobe11 (talk) 12:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. I will take your advice into account, to apply it from now on. Best regards. Allforrous (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Agricultural land has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 17:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

1969 archaeological discoveries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-nuclear power movement

[edit]

Hello, Allforrous. I know that the title with an en dash is correct, but some Commons admins (e.g. User talk:Russian Rocky#Category:Anti–nuclear power movement) are unhappy with us using en dashes in category names. Let's, at least, keep hyphenated redirects for the search. Russian Rocky (talk) 17:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Western (genre) theme parks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Astros4477 (talk) 14:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Hungarian folklore has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Cryptic-waveform Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Hindu yogis has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 10:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Bengali-speaking people by occupation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 11:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Deities and spirits has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 16:04, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pretzelles (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Yacón syrup has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ies (talk) 10:22, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Robes and cloaks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 17:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Early lives by individual has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 19:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Greek theatre

[edit]

Hi, can you explain your thinking in the two edits that you made to this category please? Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unless I hear from you by tomorrow then I will revert your edits Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to @MrKeefeJohn: I don't need to fix this. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Laurel Lodged: I explain my edits in Category talk:Ancient Greek theatre MrKeefeJohn (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crises prevention

[edit]

Hello. I noticed your edits. I think Category:Crises prevention (maybe the name should be questioned) should not be put under "Category:Prevention", because it contains images of the preparations for crisis. Prevention often means measures aimed to avoid something from happening. This category is about the preparations. Cats' photos (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Timepieces has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 14:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

History of Ireland by topic has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Negative concepts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 03:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

[edit]

See Commons:Village_pump#Category:Categories_by_association. I'm the middle of axing a couple of the more ambiguous "categories by association" and "people associated with events" is particularly nonsensical. Most people are associated with events. Especially when it comes to something like COVID. Adamant1 (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Advertising by type has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 14:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Meteorological phenomena has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at [[{{{2}}}|its entry]].

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 16:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi:

Please stop adding this category to items as they all have more precise categories already that are sub-categories of Category:Meteorological phenomena. This is redundant! (idem for categories e.g. Category:Crow instabilities is in Category:Clouds which is in Category:Weather phenomena)

Pierre cb (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Sinigh (talk) 13:11, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing music by year

[edit]

Hallo, could you help in the discussione started here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2025/03/Category:Music_in_Lombardy_by_year with a group of Wikipedians opposing categories for music by year, saying it gives birth to category that are too small and not meaningful? They seem not to grasp what a chronology is... It was all started by one person, who then called a group of people sharing his point of view. Thank you. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MetaCat vs. CatCat

[edit]

Hi, Allforrous. I noticed that you put the {{MetaCat}} template on some articles for characters by name. Those are not metacats because the subcats don't group characters with the same name. Therefore I changed the MetaCat templates to CatCat templates.

The "by name" categories can be tricky when deciding whether to use MetaCat or CatCat. Sometimes they're metacats, sometimes they're not. It depends on what's in the subcats. Most categories of people or characters by name are not metacats. That's because each subcat is for just one individual. An example of a by-name category that is a metacat is Category:Hotels by name. Each subcat there is for all hotels with the indicated name. For example, two of the subcats are Category:Grand Hotels and Category:Hotels named Plaza. In each case, multiple hotels with the same are grouped in a subcat.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.Thank you for your attention in clarifying this issue. I will take this into account, from now on, when promoting changes. Best regards. Allforrous (talk) 22:59, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Conferences by time has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


RoyZuo (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Craftsmen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 14:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Words coined in the 1930s has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


—⁠andrybak (talk) 21:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded this listing at Commons:Categories for discussion to include other categories named "Words coined in the <decade>". —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]